The Australian Army “professional development” site, The Cove, describes the US Mad Scientist Lab as an “initiative and a community of action that continually explores the future through collaborative partnerships and continuous dialogue with academia, industry and government.”Ĭlustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs) are DNA sequences in bacteria that defend against viruses. The US Army Training and Doctrine Command has an initiative literally called the Mad Scientist Laboratory. The US Army report goes on to note that, “In addition to adeno-associated viruses and self-assembled virus-like particles, … biological vesicles have begun to attract much attention.”Īfter many years of development, the technologies in question were ready to enter the mainstream of US military R&D. Recall that some professed “vaccine” manufacturers have recently used adenovirus spike proteins as delivery platforms. Nanotech robots (nanobots) are another potential weapon.Ī US Army report from 2016 describes nanobots as “origami DNA barrels that can be loaded with genetic content to be delivered to specific cell types,” including tumours, “whose surface receptor keys open locks found on the bot’s hinges.” Since the Edgewood experiments, barcoding has become an inexpensive and efficient diagnostic. The biotech involves “barcoded spores” that use genetic signatures to track and ID simulants during outdoor tests.ĭuring the post-9/11 US anthrax attacks (later traced to the FBI), swabbing was the only diagnostic method. The synthetic anthrax simulant is derived from a gypsy moth caterpillar control agent, as used in organic farming. The alleged aim was to study the bacteria in order to pre-empt a biological attack. In 2012, in the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, the US Army created a mock- Bacillus anthracis bacteria, or anthrax. Less well known is the post-9/11 era of research into biotech and genetic engineering.īetween 20, the US military spent $50bn “researching” bioweapons.
The US Army has a long history of experimenting with pathogens, much of which has been documented elsewhere. The pandemic has led to the next step in the direction of total control: the creation of what I call the “tech-pharma complex,” a system in which big data and big pharma merge to track and control the very biology, not just external behaviours, of the public.īut like MIC and MIC2, the tech-pharma complex relies on taxpayer subsidies poured into military research and development. The same kind of data dragnets used by the National Security Agency, supposedly to track terrorists, were adopted by the likes of Facebook to sell ads and user data to brokers. MIC2 saw the Central Intelligence Agency and other departments’ spinoffs fund the search engine that became Google. It became the very backbone of modern society.Īfter 9/11, the MIC transformed into the “military-intelligence complex” (MIC2). Eisenhower famously warned that a “military-industrial complex” (MIC) could lead to a “scientific dictatorship.” From the MIC emerged computers, the internet, smartphones, etc. Military Openly Discusses Genetically Weaponising DiseaseĪfter the Second World War, US President Dwight D.
0 kommentar(er)
